There was a sense of relief in March when the Trump administration’s budget proposal—which would gut federal energy efficiency budgets and wholly eliminate the ENERGY STAR program—got a decidedly hostile reception from both parties on Capitol Hill.

“There’s just some of the stuff in here that doesn’t make any sense,” said Rep. Mike Simpson, the Idaho Republican who chairs the House subcommittee overseeing most energy spending. “Frankly, you can’t pass these budgets on the floor.”

Unfortunately, the House hasn’t done much better in its own spending plans, and federal energy efficiency initiatives now face the prospect of historic spending cuts that threaten U.S. leadership and competitiveness.

The House Energy and Water spending bill, which passed the full chamber in late July as part of a broader bill, would reduce investments at the Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by about 47 percent, from $2.1 billion to $1.1 billion. With a couple of exceptions, efficiency initiatives would be slashed by almost 50 percent (versus almost 80 percent in the administration’s proposal).

As the Alliance’s Kateri Callahan said, “Cutting programs in half is not balance. It’s disastrous.”

Fortunately, a Senate appropriations bill moving more slowly through that chamber would largely protect efficiency programs. But the threat remains very real: If the House and Senate were to split their differences, traditionally bipartisan efficiency initiatives would absorb a level of spending cuts that we haven’t seen since they were started decades ago.

So just what is at stake? Everyone knows ENERGY STAR—the public-private partnership with the little blue label that gives consumers confidence they’re buying a highly efficient dryer or washing machine. But many of the other efficiency programs on the chopping block are lesser-known initiatives that nonetheless deliver enormous benefits to American consumers and businesses—not to mention our environment.

If you use common household appliances, for example, you’ll be pleased to learn that the efficiency standards for appliances developed by the Energy Department’s Building Technologies Office save the average American household about $500 a year.

If you care about American manufacturing jobs, you’ll want to know that the department’s Advanced Manufacturing Office and National Labs help develop cutting-edge manufacturing efficiency technologies. Not only that, they work closely with American manufacturers small and large to help them improve their competitiveness and, thus, their ability to expand and hire. One program helps manufacturers use Combined Heat and Power (CHP) or Waste Heat to Power (WHP) technologies to save energy (learn more on this from the Alliance for Industrial Efficiency).

If you’re concerned about federal spending, you should know that the federal government is the largest energy consumer—and thus the biggest energy spender—in the nation. And the department’s Federal Energy Management Program works throughout the government to upgrade the efficiency of federal buildings, saving taxpayers billions of dollars a year in lower energy costs.

Clearly, eliminating or cutting these programs is penny wise and pound foolish. Energy efficiency supports 2.2 million American jobs, and these programs help drive that economy.

So what’s next? Congress will continue working on the bills over the coming weeks and is expected to make final decisions in September. While we don’t know what the spending levels will be, we do know that members of Congress need to hear from you that they should not cut these programs in any final spending deal. Contact your members of Congress now.

###

The Clean Energy Business Network (CEBN) works to advance the clean energy economy through policy, public education, and business support for small- and medium-size energy companies. Started in 2009 by The Pew Charitable Trusts, the CEBN is now a small business division of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy. The CEBN represents 3,000+ business leaders across all 50 U.S. states working with a broad range of clean energy and transportation technologies.